WordPress and the GPL |
Copyright Issues Open Source & Derivative Works GPL Issues GPL Validity GPL Violations WordPress & the GPL Legal Cases ProCD v. Zeidenberg USL v. BSDi
Advertising Clause Click-Through License Compatible Licenses Copyleft Derivative Works Dual Licensing EULA FLOSS FOSS Free Software Incompatible Licenses OSD OSI Certified OSS Permissive Licenses Shrink Wrap License Viral Licenses
Licenses AGPL Apache Apple Artistic BSD CDDL CPL EPL GPL v2 GPL v3 IPL LGPL MIT Mozilla SPL X License X11 License Organizations ASF FSF OSI SFLC People Bruce Perens Eben Moglen Eric Raymond Lawrence Lessig Linus Torvalds Richard Stallman
Licenses Closed Source Freeware Shareware Organizations BSA
MS Community License MS Permissive License
Public Domain
Books |
WordPress and the GPLWordPress is blogging software that is licensed under the GPL v2 or later. The WordPress software provides provides the basic platform for blogging, but in order to create more attractive looking blogs, or to add features, users can extend the software using Themes (for appearance) or Plug-ins (to add features). A huge variety of Themes and Plug-Ins for WordPress have been developed for WordPress, and many are show cased on the WordPress website. One of the requirements of the GPL is that third parties may distribute the software, but if they do so, they must distribute the software under the GPL. Furthermore, derivative works of GPL software, must themselves be distributed under the GPL. According to the creators of WordPress, Themes and Plug-Ins are generally derivative works of WordPress, and therefore if they are distributed, they must be distributed under the GPL: Distributing under another incompatible license is GPL Violation (and therefore a form of copyright infringement). To bolster their position, sought a letter from the Software Freedom and Law Center (SFLC). Their conclusion, expressed in a published letter, was that WordPress Themes are generally derivative works of WordPress, therefore are subject to the GPL. They did however state the CSS and image files in a Theme WordPress are generally not derivative works and therefore do not have to be licensed under the GPL. Additionally, the SFLC did also state that it might be possible for someone to develop WordPress Themes which are not derivative works, but to do so that would have to forego almost all the features and functionality that make a Theme useful. On the other hand, some developers of commercially licensed Themes and Plug-Ins have asserted that their products are not derivative works of WordPress, and therefore do not have to be licensed under the GPL. As far as I know, no court or judge has looked at this issue, or even a particular example of this issue (because it could even be the situation is different from different programs/Plug-Ins/Themes), so it's currently a matter of opinions. Who is right does however have important consequences:
|